| GEORGIA RAIL PASSENGER PROGRAM | |||
| PROGRAM MANAGEMENT TEAM MEETING - June | |||
|
Held at the offices of the Georgia Regional Transportation Authority |
|||
|
June 6th, 2002 - 1:30 p.m. |
|||
| AGENDA | |||
| Chair calls meeting to order:
MINUTES APPROVAL OF BOARD AGENDA FOR JUNE 6th, 2002 NEW BUSINESS AND BOARD COMMENTS ADJOURNMENT |
|||
| _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ | |||
| MEETING MINUTES | |||
| - Notice having been duly given, the regular meeting of the Georgia Rail Passenger Program (GRPP), Program Management Team was held. | |||
| COMMITTEE MEMBERS PRESENT: | |||
| Sharon Gay, Chairman | |||
| Steven Bruning | |||
| Jimmy Lester | |||
| Carl Rhodenizer | |||
| Mather Stapleton | |||
| COMMITTEE MEMBERS ABSENT: | |||
| Brad Hubbert | |||
| * A quorum was present | |||
| CALL TO ORDER: | |||
| Ms. Gay called the meeting to order at 1:38 PM |
|||
| MINUTES: | |||
| Motion was made by Mr. Lester and seconded by Mr. Rhodenizer to approve the minutes of the May 2, 2002. The meeting minutes were approved unanimously. | |||
| AGENDA: | |||
|
Motion was made by
Mr. Lester and seconded by Mr. Rhodenizer to approve the
agenda of the June 6,
2002 meeting. The meeting agenda
was approved unanimously. Mr. Mullins presented the month’s activities: |
|||
|
|||
The team is moving
forward on the Locally Preferred
Alternative along the Athens corridor. The team has briefed various committees and local authorities as well as some coordination efforts have taken place with Dekalb County. A contract agreement has been prepared and work scope related to the Atlanta capacity analysis has been forwarded to CSX Transportation for approval. Comments have been received from the GDOT Office of Environmental Location on Historical Resources, Archaeology, and Ecology Impacts. Draft Environmental document will be ready for RPMC review during the week of June 10th. The next steps related to protecting identified station sites along the Atlanta-Macon rail corridor have been prepared. |
|||
|
|||
|
Amtrak Issue A kick-off meeting for the SEHSR
Planning study between Charlotte, North Carolina and Macon, Georgia is
tentatively scheduled for mid July. This
is a joint effort of the Departments of Transportation of Georgia, South
Carolina, and North Carolina to develop a planning
and concept engineering study to examine opportunities for increased speed
in the designated SEHSR corridor between Charlotte and Macon.
This study is funded by FRA’s high-speed rail designated funds
for the Southeast corridor. Mr. Lester
questioned the future and the relationship with AMTRAK.
|
|||
|
Macon Corridor
Acquisition Next Steps Mr.
Wilson discussed the Macon Corridor Acquisition Next Steps.
The May PMT meeting, a report by GRC completed on the site
vulnerability for stations along the Atlanta corridor was presented.
Provided to the members of the committee were a list of
coordination and site preservation activities with the status of each
location. Mr. Wilson
discussed each of the site locations and their prognosis. Mr. Wilson indicated any necessary next steps, their timeline
and issues regarding the Macon Corridor development. Mr.
Bruning questioned the timeline indicated to acquire the property and what
efforts can be taken to secure the property during this time. Mr. Wilson responded that communication has taken place with the potential property owners and some support is expected from the counties to preserve other development. Ms. Gay suggested that a Work Session taken place to provide the team members with guidance on the Station Development policy. The consensus of the team was to prepare a draft policy for review and discussion at the August meeting. |
|||
|
GRTA
Northwest Connectivity Study update Mr. Heimer presented
the Northwest Connectivity Study update. Mr. Heimer indicated that the study is looking at all
the alternative transportation modes.
Two public meeting are scheduled to take place in June, and
additional meeting will be held in August.
The attempt will be to narrow down to three or four alternatives.
Mr. Heimer indicated that an objective is to not only look at modes
and technology, but to look at what the needs around the activity centers.
|
|||
|
Adjournment: There being no further business to come before the Project Management Team, the meeting adjourned at 2:20 pm. |
|||