|
Noise
Primer
&
Commuter Rail Basics |
|
Burnt Fork Creek
Watershed Alliance
Meeting
|
|
November 13, 2001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Defining Sound
- Sound is created when objects vibrate, resulting in a minute
variation in surrounding atmospheric pressure called sound pressure.
The human response to sound depends on the magnitude of a sound
as a function of its frequency and time pattern (EPA, 1974).
Magnitude measures the physical sound energy in the air.
The range of magnitude from the faintest to the loudest sound
the ear can hear is so large that sound pressure is expressed on a
logarithmic scale in units called decibels (dB).
|
|
- A-Weighted Noise-Monitoring Equipment
- A-weighted
noise-monitoring equipment is most commonly used when conducting a
community noise study. The
readings obtained from this type of equipment are similar to how
humans perceive sounds of low to moderate magnitude.
The letter “A” indicates that the sound has been filtered
to reduce the strength of the very low and very high-frequency sounds,
much as the human ear does. If
the noise readings were taken without the A-weighting noise-monitoring
equipment, the results would include the noises that are out of human
hearing range and produce higher readings.
Noise levels that are from an A-weighted noise-monitoring
equipment are indicated by (dBA).
-
- Figure
1-1 illustrates the A-weighted levels of some common sounds.
The range of human hearing extends from about 0 dBA for young
healthy ears (that have not been exposed to loud noise sources) to
about 140 dBA. When
sounds exceed 110 dBA, however, there is a potential for
hearing damage, even with relatively short exposures.
|
- Data Obtained from Noise
Readings
- In measuring community noise,
noise readings are taken every second and from that an Leq
(dBA) is obtained. A Leq
is defined as a
receiver’s cumulative noise exposure from all events over a one-hour
period. Because humans are more sensitive to noise disturbance during
nighttime hours, a day-night equivalent sound level (Ldn)
is frequently used to estimate the overall disturbance people
experience from environmental noise.
The Ldn is measured over a full 24 hour time period,
with events between 10 pm to 7 am increased by 10 dBA to account for
greater nighttime noise sensitivity.
The effect of this penalty is that any event occurring during
the nighttime hours is equivalent to ten events during the daytime
hours. This emphasizes Ldn toward nighttime noise is to
reflect that most people are easily annoyed by noise during the
nighttime hours when background noise is lower and most people are
sleeping.
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Typical
Community Noise Levels
- The FTA manual Transit
Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment (April 1995) uses Ldn
levels to characterize community noise in residential areas. Figure
1-2 defines typical community noise levels in terms of Ldn.
Most urban and suburban neighborhoods are in the range of Ldn
50 dBA to 70 dBA. Residential
neighborhoods that are not near major sound sources are usually within
the range of Ldn 55 dBA to 60 dBA. However, if there is a
freeway or moderately busy arterial nearby, or any nighttime noise,
then the Ldn is usually in the range of 60 dBA to 65 dBA.
A noise level of 70 dBA reflects a relatively noisy
environment. This reading
could be associated with an area that has buildings located on or
close to a busy surface street, freeway, or airport.
This noise level would usually be considered unacceptable for
residential land use without taking special measures in order to
enhance outdoor-indoor sound insulation.
|
|
Figure
1-2 Typical Day-Night Noise Levels
|
|
- Land Use Categories
- Three
land use categories have been developed for the various land use types
within a project area. Table
1-1 defines the various land use categories.
The land use category is a factor used in determining if there
are any impacts from the change in noise exposure due to a proposed
project.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 1-1
Land use Categories and Metrics for Transit Noise Impact Criteria
- Amount of Noise Impact from a Proposed Project
-
- Figure
1-3 and Table 1-2 illustrate the amount of impact a proposed project
has on an area based on the land use category, existing noise exposure
(dBA) and the proposed noise exposure (dBA).
The noise impact criteria in Table 1-2 and Figure 1-3 are based
on comparing the existing outdoors noise levels and the future
outdoors noise levels that would result from the proposed project.
Figure 1-3 Noise Impact Criteria for Transit
Projects
Source:
Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment, FTA, April 1995. |
|
Table 1-2
Noise Levels Defining Impact for Transit Projects
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The noise
levels incorporate both the absolute criteria, which considers
activity interference caused by the proposed project itself, and the
relative criteria, which considers the annoyance created due to the change
in the noise environment caused by the proposed project.
These criteria were developed so that they could be applied to
various transit modes, to recognize the heightened community annoyance
caused by late-night or early-morning transit service, and to respond to
the varying sensitivity of communities to projects under different
background noise conditions.
Figure
1-4 is similar to Figure 1-3 in that it illustrates the amount of noise
impact a proposed project will have on an area.
It differs from Figure 1-3 in that it compares the existing noise
exposure to the amount of noise increase, rather than the total proposed
project noise exposure. |
|
|
|
|
|
| Figure 1-4 shows that as the existing noise exposure
increases, the allowable increase in noise exposure from a proposed
project decreases. The
justification for this is that people who are already exposed to high
levels of noise will notice any small increase in noise in their community
and become annoyed. In contrast, if
the existing noise levels are low, a greater change in the community noise
will be required before an equivalent level of annoyance is reached.
Table
3 describes the perceived effect a person has from an increase or
decrease of noise levels by various amounts. |
|
Table 3
Perceived Impacts from Noise Level Changes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adding Noise Readings
Because
noise is measured on a decibel scale, combining two noise levels is not
achieved by simple addition. For example, combining two 60 dBA noise
levels does not equal a noise level of 120 dBA (which is near the
threshold of pain), but yields 63 dBA, which is lower than the volume at
which most people listen to their televisions.
Table 1-4 contains criteria used when adding two or more noise
reading together. An example
of adding noise readings follow Table 1-4.
Table 1-4
Criteria for Adding Two Noise Readings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Example |
|
|
|
|
| Three
noise reading were taken. The values of the noise readings are as
follows: |
|
|
|
1.
79 dBA |
|
|
|
|
2.
68 dBA |
|
|
|
|
3.
75 dBA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| First, arrange the noise
readings in order from lowest reading to highest reading: |
|
|
|
1.
68 dBA |
|
|
|
|
2.
75 dBA |
|
|
|
|
3.
79 dBA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Next, subtract the first
reading from the second reading: |
|
|
|
75 dBA – 68 dBA = 7 dBA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Go to Table 1-4.
Since the two readings differ by a value of 7 dBA (falls in the 4
to 9 dBA category), the amount that is added to the higher reading is 1
dBA. |
|
75 dBA + 1 dBA = 76 dBA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Now take this value and
subtract it from the next reading, repeating the process over again: |
|
79 dBA – 76 dBA = 3 dBA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Go to Table 1-4.
Because the difference in the readings is 3 dBA, the amount to be
added to the higher reading value is 2 dBA: |
|
79 dBA + 2 dBA = 81 dBA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| The results of adding these
three readings give a total noise level of 81 dBA.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Figure 5
Train Noise Sources
|
- Emory Campus to Tucker Noise Segment Preliminary Noise
Impact Results
- Noise receptors for the segment between the Emory campus and
Tucker station were divided into two categories: those near grade crossings where trains must blow horns to
warn autos and those outside those areas.
The closest residences in the segment inside and outside the
horn zone are estimated to be at a distance of 80 feet and 95 feet
from the project corridor respectively and have estimated existing Ldns
of 70 dBA (without horn) and 79 dBA (with horn).
-
- Utilizing FTA methodology and equations the project noise
contribution was calculated and the potential for train noise impact
was assessed. Applying
the FTA criteria for defining train noise impacts the results of the
preliminary impact analysis indicate that there would be no impact at
residential receptors located beyond 34 feet in the No Horn Zones and
beyond 266 feet in the Horn Zones.
-
- Table
5 summarizes the results of the Emory campus – Tucker stations
segment noise impact analysis.
|
| Table 5
Noise Survey Results (Emory to Tucker)
|
|
Analysis
Segment
|
Closest
Receptor Distance
|
Existing
Noise Level Ldn
(dBA)
|
Project
Noise Contribu-tion (dBA)
|
FTA Impact
Criteria
|
Estimated
Impact Distances (ft)
|
Potential
Impact at Residential Receptors
|
|
|
|
|
|
NI
|
I
|
SI
|
NI
|
I
|
SI
|
|
|
No Horn Zones
|
|
Emory
Campus to Tucker
|
80
|
70
|
59
|
<65
|
65-69
|
>69
|
>34
|
34
|
16
|
No Impact
|
|
Horn Zones
|
|
Emory
Campus to Tucker
|
95
|
79
|
73
|
<66
|
66-75
|
>75
|
>266
|
266
|
57
|
Impact
29 Houses
|
|
| At
this time estimated distances do not account for any existing shielding or
changes in elevation between the tracks and the receptors. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Commuter
Rail Basics
|
|
| Commuter
Rail Equipment & Stations
|
|
|
Typical Locomotive,
Double-deck Coach Configuration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Double-deck Coach
Interior (upper level) |
|
|
|
|
|
Two Virginia Railway
Express Stations
|
Station Under
Development with Parking Structure
|
|
|
|
|
|